AMD vs Intel: Which Processor Should You Buy?

Anyone who is interested in laptops has heard of the AMD vs Intel laptop. For years, these two manufacturers have been in a contest in the component’s arena. And the battle is just raging as newer internals are rolling out from both sides.

Because of this AMD vs Intel rivalry, it also became harder to choose the best processor or graphics card. Both sides are producing better components very fast, and this makes it hard to decide on which one to get.
That is why we are here with some insights to help you make a choice.


Performance of AMD vs Intel

After you have settled yourself on a budget for a new CPU, it’s time to choose what you should go for in terms of performance. When it comes to overall performance, AMD vs Intel laptop has been on a pretty even fight.
If you want to buy an AMD processor, remember that very few of their available CPU comes with integrated graphics. Those that feature integrated graphics are referred to as an Accelerated Processing unit. At around $80 (£62), you can get the affordable AMD Athlon 240GE, and it comes with Radeon Vega 3 integrated graphics. So, if your budget is low, this is a perfect choice.

Performance of AMD vs Intel
  • Save

Now that AMD has unveiled the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, you’ve got a few more options. While these two might set you back a bit, they offer much better performance. For example, the Ryzen 3 3300X delivers performance that could only be found on mid-range or high-end hardware.
For everyday use and multitasking, the AMD Ryzen line is a good choice because they offer the most PCIe. This enables you to use more solid-state drives, which gives you a faster computer startup and file recall. One thing to remember is that the AMD processor tends to run hotter than the ones from Intel. So, for your new CPU, you should consider a liquid cooling system or a supplementary fan.


On the other hand, Intel chip’s come with integrated Intel HD or Iris graphics. So, no matter what CPU you choose, this allows you to stream quality video right out of the box. However, like their AMD counterparts, if you want to run graphically demanding programs, you will need to choose a companion GPU.
But each CPU with the latest Coffee and Ice Lake processor will beat the Threadripper and AMD Ryzen units on core-by-core performance.  Though the difference is minimal. The introduction of Tiger Lake in late 2020 could see even better-integrated graphics rendering capability for a greater streaming experience right out of the box.

Compare Table Of Top 8 Processor AMD VS Intel

Model CPU Cores/Threads Base TDP
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Zen 3 12/24 3.7/4.8 105W
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Zen 3 16/32 3.4/4.9 105W
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X  Zen 3  8/16 3.8/4.7 105W
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X  Zen 3  6/12 3.7/4.6 65W
Intel Core i9-10900K Comet Lake 10/20  3.7/5.3 125W
Intel Core i9-10850K Comet Lake 10/20 3.6/5.2 95W
Intel Core i9-10980XE Cascade Lake-X 18/36 3.0/4.8 165W
Intel Core i7-10700K Comet Lake 8/16 3.8/5.1 125W

Specs of AMD vs Intel

To give you better insights on the capability, price, and performance of both the processors, we have talked about the Ryzen 9 3950X and the Intel i9-9900K. Each of them can provide plenty of power. However, both have their own merits and demerits.
As we have mentioned earlier, the Ryzen 9 3950X comes with 16 cores and 32 threads, providing you with the power you need to handle everyday multitasking and regular workloads in an office setting. The whole Ryzen 3000 series are all fairly close to each other when it comes to multitasking capabilities and frame rates. So, the decision depends on how many cores and threads you will require.


Along with 64MB of cache, the Ryzen 9 3950X has dual-channel memory support. This helps to recall your frequently-used files and programs faster. It has 3.5 GHz of base clock speed and a Max Boost Clock of 4.7 GHz. This will allow you to tackle just about any work task at blazing speeds.


Compare to the Ryzen 9 3950X, the Intel i9-9900K features half the number of cores and threads. However, with its slightly stronger single-core performance, it makes up for some of that. The base speed of the i9-9900K is 3.6GHz, and it has a Turbo clock of whopping 5GHz. And compared to the Ryzen 9’s 105 watts, the i9-9900K uses just 95 watts of power. Though it gives you around half the total performance.
You will get full HD as well as 4K graphical and video support right out of the box with Intel’s integrated graphics. Along with great streaming, you will also get awesome frame rates.


Technical and customer support of AMD vs Intel

AMD offers a whole webpage to provide customer and technical support for their CPUs. You can also download the newest drivers for integrated GPUs or the Radeon graphics processor.  This web page lets you download full spec sheets, check up on the warranty of your product. Plus, there is a dedicated forum where you can ask other AMD users questions.

If you have any issue with a specific unit, there is a drop-down menu where you can select your CPU, which will direct you to a page where you will find driver links as well as a customer support page. This is very useful for more in-depth troubleshooting.

Technical and customer support
  • Save

The official site of Intel also offers a dedicated page where you can get technical support if you face any issue with your existing or new CPU. There you will be able to download drivers, view spec sheets, browse various blog posts to find the answers to frequently asked questions, and if your questions aren’t answered by the FAQ, you can access the support community forum. And if you need a thorough solution to your problem, Intel offers live chat or phone support.


Price of AMD vs Intel

In the past, AMD was a go-to choice if you wanted a decent CPU with a budget-friendly price. However, AMD is becoming similar or even surpassing Intel components on price with their latest generation of Ryzen CPUs. For example, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is their most expensive unit, and it cost around $750 (£580). However, this high price also backs up some impressive technology.

The Ryzen 9 3950X exceeds the previous flagship, the Ryzen 9 3900X, and sports 16 cores and 32 threads. Compare to its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 3950X doesn’t only have more cores and threads, it also has more cache memory and faster processing speeds. Plus, it gives you the ability to store up to four different profiles for different overclocking settings and performance. So, regardless of whether you are a hardcore user or just a casual user, you will always get the ultimate performance out of your CPU.

Price of AMD vs Intel
  • Save

On the lower end, you will find AMD’s new budget champions – the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 and AMD Ryzen 3 3300X. They cost about $99 and $120 respectively and deliver impressive power. Once again, this proves that when it comes to affordability and multi-threaded performances, AMD is the king.
When it comes to Intel, most people are probably familiar with the Coffee Lake Refresh processor. The i9-9900K is the newest generation of Coffee Lake Refresh processors from Intel. It gives you 8 cores to work with and has natively integrated graphics, and it retails for about $550 (£420).


Nevertheless, the latest Comet Lake-S desktop processor led by the Core i9-10900K was just unveiled and is well on their way. This chip with high specs boasts 10 cores, 20 threads, and can provide a boost of 5.3GHz, and all this at about $488 (£395). The Core i7-10700K that offers 8 cores and 16 threads with a boost of 5.1GHz is another notable chip in this new line, and it costs around $374 (£300).

If you are looking for a high-end CPU and have the pockets to pay for it, the third generation of AMD Threadripper units is the ultimate choice. The Threadripper 3990X costs about a whopping $3,900 (£3,030). For an average PC user, this is well out of range. This CPU is built with 64 cores as well as 128 threads to provide the user with plenty of power to rip through complex mathematical models and get your work done easily.



Future speculation of AMD vs Intel

The past few years for AMD were pretty successful with their Threadripper and Ryzen lines of CPUs. They have twice the number of cores and threads compare to their counterparts. The breathing on Intel’s neck and proven its worth as a dependable choice for PC components.
On the other hand, Intel came across some failures, like their lackluster release of Cannon Lake. However, they seem to have learned from their mistake, which they can apply to future releases.


Announcements have been made by Intel for future releases of their Comet Lake-S and Tiger Lake lines of processors for desktops and laptops. It is most likely that the new CPU line will try and stay up with the Ryzen and Threadripper products from AMD. However, it seems a bit unlikely that Intel will be able to beat AMD any time soon.


Coming generations of Ryzen processors from AMD will most likely continue to provide users with more cores and threads for more efficient as well as faster multitasking. Whenever the Ryzen 4000 processor from AMD comes out to market, a further boost to IPC performance and power efficiency should be seen with the shift to a more efficient 7nm+ manufacturing process. The future of Threadripper’s seems to remain on track to provide powerful CPU options to industry professionals.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap